The Shimoda Law Corp. has settled and is litigating the following class action lawsuits
on behalf of employees in California:
Fowler v. Huisman Auction, Inc. Case No. 34-2009-00058597 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
This case is an individual action brought on behalf of “similarly situated” employees under the Private Attorney General Act (Labor Code section 2699 et al.). Plaintiff has alleged violations of overtime, meal and rest breaks, and inaccurate paystubs.
Plaintiff is in discovery, seeking to obtain the names and contact information of all “similarly situated” employees.
Colbert v. American Home Craft Inc., No. 05AS05012 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
This case involved telemarketers who were not paid for all
hours worked, failed to receive the correct amount of bonuses,
and were forced to report to work and then sent home without
pay.
The case settled and was approved by the Sacramento Superior
Court. The settlement included monetary and non-monetary
relief including immediate compliance with wage and hour laws.
Williams v. Civic Development Group, No. 06AS00267 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
Plaintiff alleged that telemarketers were not provided full 10
minute breaks for each four hours worked and not paid for their rest
breaks. This case has resolved and the Sacramento Superior
Court approved monetary and non-monetary relief as part of the
settlement to putative class members.
Arnall v. North American Merchandising Service Inc., No. 06AS01439 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
Plaintiff alleged that employees were not paid overtime for all
hours worked in excess of eight hours per day and/or 40 hours
per week. This case has resolved and the Sacramento
Superior Court approved monetary relief for class members.
Gerard v. Les Schwab Tires
Center of California, Inc., No. 34-2007-30000003 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
Plaintiff alleges that salaried employees unlawfully lost vacation
pay based on a use-it or lose-it policy and that Defendant
misclassified Store Manager. A motion for certification is pending.
Aymer v. Sutter Health et
al., No. 34-2008-00003432 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
Plaintiff alleges that hourly employees including nurses were not
provided meal and rest breaks in violation of California law.
This case is currently being consolidated with other similar
class actions filed. The case is currently in discovery.
Josol v. Dial Medical Corp., No.
34-2008-00010040 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
Plaintiff alleges that hourly employees including nurses were not
reimbursed for mileage, overtime, and hours worked in violation
of California law. The Court granted certification in this case.
CONTACT US
If you believe that you have information that may support any of the class actions
listed here, please call our office or submit your contact information through our website by clicking here.
