Header image  
     LABOR & EMPLOYMENT
          BUSINESS LITIGATION
                  PERSONAL INJURY LAW
 
line decor
                 SERVICIO EN ESPAÑOL                              CALL NOW (916) 525-0716
line decor
 
 
 
 

 
 
CLASS ACTIONS

The Shimoda Law Corp. has settled and is litigating the following class action lawsuits on behalf of employees in California:

Gasbarro v. Kovars, Inc., Case No. 34-2011-00097883 (Sacramento Sup. Court)
  • Plaintiff alleges Defendant required all employees to sign a covenant not to compete in violation of the California Business and Professions Code section 16600.

  • The parties are in the early stages of pleadings and discovery.

Gilliam v. Matrix Energy Services, Inc., Case No. RG 11592345 (Alameda Sup. Court)
  • Plaintiff is alleging failure to provide reimbursement expenses for use of personal vehicles, failure to pay all hours worked, and failure to pay overtime.

  • The parties are in the pleading stage.

Acosta v. Acosta Sales, LLC, et al., No. Case No. 2:11-CV-01796 (C.D. Cal.)
  • Plaintiffs allege failure to pay overtime, off the clock wages, reimbursement, among other wages owed. This case is a multi-national class action that extends beyond California and involves the FLSA.

  • The parties are currently engaged in discovery.

Schechter et al. v. Isys Solutions, Inc., Case No. RG10550517 (Alameda Sup. Ct.)
  • This case involves nurses who work from home and travel to different destinations. The Complaint alleges failure by the company to pay overtime, off the clock wages, and reimbursement wages.

  • The case is currently in discovery and depositions.

Robinson v. West of Chicago Restaurants Inc. (dba as Chicago Fire), Case No. 2010-00082201 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
  • Plaintiff alleges that the company failed to provide him and other similarly situated employees meal and rest periods as required by law. This case settled and Plaintiff is preparing for preliminary approval of settlement.

Fowler v. Huisman Auction, Inc. Case No. 34-2009-00058597 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
  • This case is an individual action brought on behalf of “similarly situated” employees under the Private Attorney General Act (Labor Code section 2699 et al.). Plaintiff has alleged violations of overtime, meal and rest breaks, and inaccurate paystubs.

  • Plaintiff is in discovery, seeking to obtain the names and contact information of all “similarly situated” employees.

Colbert v. American Home Craft Inc., No. 05AS05012 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
  • This case involved telemarketers who were not paid for all hours worked, failed to receive the correct amount of bonuses, and were forced to report to work and then sent home without pay. 

  • The case settled and was approved by the Sacramento Superior Court.  The settlement included monetary and non-monetary relief including immediate compliance with wage and hour laws.

Williams v. Civic Development Group, No. 06AS00267 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
  • Plaintiff alleged that telemarketers were not provided full 10 minute breaks for each four hours worked and not paid for their rest breaks.  This case has resolved and the Sacramento Superior Court approved monetary and non-monetary relief as part of the settlement to putative class members.
Arnall v. North American Merchandising Service Inc., No. 06AS01439 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
  • Plaintiff alleged that employees were not paid overtime for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day and/or 40 hours per week.  This case has resolved and the Sacramento Superior Court approved monetary relief for class members.

 
Gerard v. Les Schwab Tires Center of California, Inc., No. 34-2007-30000003 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
  • Plaintiff alleges that salaried employees unlawfully lost vacation pay based on a use-it or lose-it policy and that Defendant misclassified Store Manager. Plaintiff’s Motion for Certification was granted as to the vacation pay issue.
Aymer v. Sutter Health et al., No. 34-2008-00003432 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
  • Plaintiff alleges that hourly employees including nurses were not provided meal and rest breaks in violation of California law.  This case is currently being consolidated with other similar class actions filed. The case is currently in discovery.
Josol v. Dial Medical Corp., No. 34-2008-00010040 (Sac. Sup. Ct.)
  • Plaintiff alleges that hourly employees including nurses were not reimbursed for mileage, overtime, and hours worked in violation of California law. The Court granted certification in this case.




 

CONTACT US
If you believe that you have information that may support any of the class actions listed here, please call our office or submit your contact information through our website by clicking here